Tongue v. Crissy, 1855
View case here

This case is about slaves or slavery.

Year: 1855
Citation: 7 Md. 453
Jurisdiction: Maryland
People: Rhody and Crissy
Short Summary: Arguing if consent of the manumitted slave is necessary in light of the act of 1831 declaring that any manumitted slave can be free and that a manumittor is liable for support for a slave not able to take care of themselves. Affirming freedom, no consent to freedom is necessary.
Law type:
Full name: Thomas Tongue vs. Negroes Crissy, Rhody and others
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland

Cites 7 cases:
Cited by 4 cases: