This case is about slaves or slavery.
| Year: | 1860 |
| Citation: | 9 Fla. 278 |
| Jurisdiction: | Supreme Court of FL |
| People: | |
| Short Summary: | For a slave transaction for a slave believed to be "not of sound mind and body." Concluding that the remedy for breach of warranty is only a right of action if nothing is promised to be paid |
| Law type: | |
| Full name: | Barnard Kendig, for use of H. N. Gould, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Thomas Giles, Defendant in Error |
| Court: | Florida Supreme Court |