This case is about slaves or slavery.
| Year: | 1832 |
| Citation: | 4 G. & J. 420 |
| Jurisdiction: | Maryland |
| People: | |
| Short Summary: | The court acknowelding that a divisible contract for which rents should be taken for the hire of slaves rather than a mortgage. Furthermore, concluding that usury cannot be relied on as a defence. |
| Law type: | |
| Full name: | Daniel Chambers vs. Prudence G. Chalmers, et al. |
| Court: | Court of Appeals of Maryland |